Uber Technologies and Lyft were spared from having to rapidly convert their California drivers to employees after a state appeals court agreed they can keep their business models in place while challenging a judge’s order to comply with a state labor law.
The decision Thursday is a big reprieve for the ride-hailing companies, whose leaders said they might need to temporarily shut down in their home state if forced on short notice to provide drivers with costly benefits including health insurance and overtime. The appeals court scheduled arguments for Oct. 13.
Lyft shares rose as much as 8.6% on the news, while Uber’s stock gained 7.75%.
The delay buys time for the companies as they campaign for a ballot measure set for a statewide vote in November that would free app-based transportation and delivery companies from the sweeping requirements of the law known as Assembly Bill 5.
Proposition 22 exempts the companies from paying for full benefits that employees currently get under California law, such as unemployment insurance and complete workers compensation, while requiring them to pay 120% of minimum wage, health care contributions and medical and disability coverage, among others.
San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ethan Schulman had refused on Aug. 13 to indefinitely pause the injunction he issued earlier in the week.
More must-read tech coverage from Fortune:
- ‘It’s clicks versus bricks’: Why tech stocks won’t be fading anytime soon
- Samsung Note20 Ultra review: Why this big phone works for the COVID era
- Facebook and NYU researchers discover a way to speed up MRI scans
- The U.S. Postal Service is seeking a patent for voting by phone
- Electric-vehicle startup Canoo to go public, joining the wave of companies chasing Tesla’s success