: Over 11 million Americans face an unemployment cliff if lawmakers don’t extend COVID-19 relief programs

This post was originally published on this site

It’s deja vu all over again for jobless Americans.

Some 11.2 million Americans will be cut off from receiving unemployment benefits by March 14, according to estimates calculated by Andrew Stettner, a senior fellow at the liberal-leaning Century Foundation.

Some 12 million Americans almost faced a similar fate at the end of last year while Democratic and Republican lawmakers finalized a stimulus package that was ultimately signed into law on Dec. 27.

Out-of-work Americans have been receiving unemployment benefits through two CARES Act programs — Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program and Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation PEUC).

The PUA program allowed self-employed workers, freelancers, gig workers and independent contractors to collect unemployment benefits. It helps those who have exhausted their state unemployment aid.

In addition to $600 stimulus checks, the package extended PUA and other CARES Act unemployment programs to mid-March, and reinstated enhanced unemployment benefits to $300 extra a week to mid-March.

It’s likely that jobless Americans will continue to receive enhanced unemployment given that it’s included in President Joe Biden’s $1.9-trillion stimulus package proposal, as well as a counter stimulus proposal supported by at least 10 Republican lawmakers.

Also see: Here’s what’s in the $600 billion relief plan from 10 Republican senators

Biden’s package calls for increasing the enhanced benefits to $400 per week through September. The Republican proposal calls for keeping the $300 per week through the end of June.

The two proposals differ more significantly when it comes to Pandemic Unemployment Assistance and Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation. Biden’s proposal calls for extending these two programs through September while the $600-billion Republican proposal leaves out these two programs entirely.

But that doesn’t mean Republicans won’t reconsider adding in the two programs, said Ed Mills, Washington policy analyst at Raymond James. “Both sides really know that to get a bipartisan deal there’s going to need to be a compromise.”

Lawmakers understand that “all politics is local,” Mills said. They don’t want to be in the hot seat come mid-March when people are “wondering whether or not the aid that they have depended upon to pay their rent pay for food is going to continue — or if it’s going to expire.”

Add Comment